TruePulse vs 15Five

TruePulse vs 15Five
for employee surveys.

15Five is built around weekly manager check-ins, 1:1s and performance conversations — all of them attributed by design. TruePulse is built around the opposite guarantee: responses that carry no identity at all, so people say what they actually think.

15Five's check-in model is attributed on purpose: the manager is meant to know who wrote what, because it drives the 1:1. That is a legitimate design — it just cannot produce the kind of feedback people only give when they are certain nobody can trace it.

Feature comparison

TruePulse vs 15Five — side by side

FeatureTruePulse15Five
Genuinely anonymous responses
Weekly manager check-ins
K-anonymity threshold enforcement
Segment analytics (dept, team, location)Limited
Driver analysis
I/O psychologist-written templatesVaries
Slack-native peer recognition includedHigh Fives
CostFree — every feature, every seatPaid, per employee
Why teams switch

Why HR teams move from 15Five to TruePulse

Attributed feedback has a ceiling

People do not tell their manager, in a system their manager reads, that their manager is the problem. If your check-in scores look healthy while attrition rises, that gap is the reason.

You need org-level signal, not per-manager threads

Check-in tools aggregate poorly. TruePulse is built to answer org-level questions: which departments are diverging, which dimension predicts satisfaction, where burnout risk is concentrated.

The two can coexist

Plenty of teams keep their check-in habit and add TruePulse alongside it for the anonymous layer — there is no migration, and no cost to trying.

See the difference for yourself.

Free plan forever. Every feature included. No credit card required.

Start with TruePulse free